Edis最近也开始大力推广他家的基于KVM的VPS了(看来KVM越来越受欢迎了)。最便宜的KVM只需要1.99欧元/月,但是鉴于他的硬盘只有1G,即使是跑Debian恐怕也撑不起个Blog。所以这里只给大家介绍这家的3.99欧元的Plan。使用优惠码BESMART,可以将硬盘升级至5G(原有配置是2G)(查看性能测试)。但这批KVM位于奥地利的机房,国内连接速度一般(Ping值测速)。如果是面对欧洲用户,或者是其他需求的可以推荐尝试。关于Edis,这家主要经营欧洲VPS,有12年的历史,信誉应该不错。
EDIS – 3.99欧元 KVM 256MB 5G 100G 奥地利
- 256MB memory
- 5GB storage
- 100GB/month data transfer on 1Gbps
- KVM
- 测试ip:91.227.205.2
- 直接购买
本款KVM的测试报告(源于LEB)
~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 3 model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.1 stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 2533.488 cache size : 4096 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 4 wp : yes flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep pge cmov mmx fxsr sse sse2 up pni popcnt hypervisor bogomips : 5066.97 clflush size : 32 cache_alignment : 32 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 32 bits virtual power management: ~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.89544 s, 142 MB/s ~$ wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --2011-08-09 18:52:36-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test' 100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 26.2M/s in 3.9s 2011-08-09 18:52:40 (25.5 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600] ~$ wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin --2011-08-09 18:51:52-- ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin => `100mb.bin' Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155 Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done. ==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600 ==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done. Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative) 100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 3.33M/s in 16s 2011-08-09 18:52:10 (6.15 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600] ~$ wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin --2011-08-09 18:52:15-- ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin => `test.bin' Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9 Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed. ==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600 ==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test.bin ... done. Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative) 100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 10.7M/s in 14s 2011-08-09 18:52:29 (7.13 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600] ~$./Run # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: ***: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Mon Jun 13 04:13:06 UTC 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.1 (5067.0 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 18:55:33 up 1 day, 1:01, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 09 2011 18:55:33 - 19:23:47 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17431265.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3006.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5287.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1226378.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 340790.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2021024.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2128746.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 386572.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 21050.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6874.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 885.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3735875.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17431265.4 1493.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3006.2 546.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 5287.5 1229.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1226378.9 3096.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 340790.4 2059.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2021024.0 3484.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2128746.1 1711.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 386572.4 966.4 Process Creation 126.0 21050.1 1670.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6874.6 1621.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 885.4 1475.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3735875.2 2490.6 ========
简单的Ping值测速
序号 | Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 襄阳[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 458毫秒 | 48 |
2 | 眉山[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 451毫秒 | 48 |
3 | 厦门[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 420毫秒 | 47 |
4 | 河南[联通] | 91.227.205.2 | 385毫秒 | 49 |
5 | 上海[移动] | 91.227.205.2 | 419毫秒 | 43 |
6 | 浙江[移动] | 91.227.205.2 | 372毫秒 | 47 |
7 | 山东[联通] | 91.227.205.2 | 458毫秒 | 49 |
8 | 美国[地区] | 91.227.205.2 | 165毫秒 | 45 |
9 | 泉州[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 428毫秒 | 47 |
10 | 福州[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 436毫秒 | 48 |
11 | 沈阳[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 465毫秒 | 47 |
12 | 合肥[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 444毫秒 | 46 |
13 | 眉山[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 368毫秒 | 48 |
14 | 乐山[电信] | 91.227.205.2 | 371毫秒 | 47 |